SourceWayne Schmidt's Wesleyan Ordination Succession
When Wesleyan General Superintendent, Wayne Schmidt, officiates ordination services, he is continuing a long, historic line of ministerial calling/leadership as the mantle is passed to the next generation. Wayne Schmidt was ordained by O. D. Emery (Wesleyan Church) O. D. Emery ordained by Louis Willard Sturk (Pilgrim Holiness). Louis Willard (L. W.) Sturk ordained by George B. Kulp (Pilgrim Holiness) George Kulp was ordained by Stephen Merrill (Methodist Episcopal) Stephen Merrill was ordained by Thomas Asbury Morris (Methodist Episcopal) Thomas Asbury Morris was ordained by Robert Richford Roberts (Methodist Episcopal) Robert Richford Roberts was ordained by the renowned circuit riding evangelist, Francis Asbury (Methodist) Francis Asbury was ordained by Thomas Coke (Methodist) Thomas Coke was ordained by a renegade priest named John Wesley (Anglican) John Wesley was ordained by John Potter, Bishop of Oxford (Anglican). From Potter -- there's a trail all the way back...
Why would they advertise for losers? That is a horrible sign.
ReplyDeleteThey were advertising for "closers" but the "c" fell off
ReplyDeleteThe teacher needs to rethink his comments on students' papers.
ReplyDeleteAll kidding aside, it is time we quit enabling 'losers' and expect them to carry their own weight in this world.
ReplyDelete'Losers' are usually too busy making up excuses to take advantage of any opportunity. They thrive on 'whining'.
Keetha,
ReplyDeleteBefore I would judge any teacher's comment, I would want to know the entire history of this student-teacher relationship. We also know nothing about the mother-daughter realtionship.
Perhaps this teacher was the most positive force in this child's life. And he was trying to change not only the direction of this student but perhaps the direction of the student's family.
Thank you for the job lead
ReplyDeleteBorn Loser,
ReplyDeleteI hope to give you an opportunity to serve me "with a smile."
As a teacher, I went and read the article. I didn't see anything there to justify calling a student a "loser." I know all about trying to motivate students to perform to their ability even when they don't think they do have ability. I can't think of a single scenario where calling them a "loser" would help or be appropriate.
ReplyDeleteOnce we write something on a student's paper - - - it is there - - - embedded in their self-image forever.
So, I stand by my original comment - - - only I'll make it stronger to include myself - - - WE teachers need to think very carefully about what we write on students' papers, and how we write it.
That goes for our spoken words to them too.
And our attitudes.
It isn't an easy job - - - being a teacher - - -
Don't judge another until you've walked in their shoes for a mile.
ReplyDeleteAnother teacher.
I've learned to be very skeptical of anything I read or hear, especially when so many seem to have a hidden agenda. I only believe half of what I actually see with my own eyes.
ReplyDeleteJust what is a reliable source?
Only those involved know the actual truth.
Of course, this blog is the rare exception -- you can believe everything you read here :)
ReplyDeleteInfo is only as good as your sources. That is why I like to check with 'my reliable source, God,' before making decisions based on what man has said or written.
ReplyDeleteToo many read an article and 'jump on the bandwagon' before they stop and consider the source.